Skip to content
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has arraigned 58 foreign nationals, comprising Chinese and Filipinos, before a Federal High Court in Lagos on charges including fraud and impersonation, alongside attempts to destabilise Nigeria’s constitutional structure.
Four different judges, including Justice Ayokunle Faji, Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, Justice Denide Dipeolu, and Justice Alexander Owoeye, arraigned the defendants separately.
The EFCC had earlier secured an interim forfeiture order for digital assets valued at $222,729.86, linked to fraudulent activities allegedly carried out by Chinese and Filipino nationals.
Justice Owoeye granted the interim forfeiture order following a motion ex-parte moved by Zeenat Atiku, a prosecuting counsel with the EFCC. The defendants were among suspected fraudsters apprehended on December 10, 2024, by the EFCC at their hideout in Victoria Island, Lagos. The gravity of the impersonation charges cannot be overstated, as they strike at the heart of national security and economic stability.
Understanding the Impersonation Charges
The court arraigned the defendants on separate charges of alleged cybercrimes, cyberterrorism, possession of documents containing pretences, and identity theft, among others.The defendants were arraigned on separate charges bordering on alleged cybercrimes, cyberterrorism, possession of documents containing false pretenses, and identity theft, among others. These charges reflect a wide range of illegal activities, with impersonation often serving as a key element in executing these complex schemes.
They pleaded not guilty to the charges, and the court ordered that they be remanded in the Nigeria Correctional Centres. The court remanded the females in the Kirikiri Correctional Centre and the males in Ikoyi Correctional Centre. The EFCC’s swift action underscores the country’s commitment to combating financial crimes and related offenses, sending a clear message that Nigeria will not be a haven for individuals seeking to engage in impersonation and other illicit activities. Now, let’s break down how the edits were applied:
